Accessibility
What has been tested, and what has not.
We aim to meet WCAG 2.1 level AA. This page states what we have actually verified rather than claiming conformance we have not had independently reviewed.
Verified on this site
Keyboard and focus
Every link, field, tab and button is reachable and operable by keyboard, in a sensible order, with a visible bronze focus outline. A skip link jumps past the navigation to the main content.
Screen readers
Headings run in order on every page, landmarks are named, forms have real labels tied to their fields, and errors are announced in a summary that moves focus to the first problem. Multi-step forms announce the step and the result.
Contrast and text size
Body and interface text meets the contrast standard against its background; bronze is used for accents rather than small low-contrast copy. Pages remain usable at 200% zoom without loss of content, and reflow at narrow widths down to 320 pixels.
Motion
Animation is restrained, and anyone whose system asks for reduced motion gets a fully static experience with nothing hidden or withheld — including the opening sequence, which is skipped entirely.
Automated and manual checks
Every public page was checked with an automated accessibility engine in a real browser and reports no violations, and each was also walked through by keyboard. The private sign-in and partner pages were checked the same way.
Known gaps
These are open, and we would rather name them than imply they are closed.
- No audit by an independent accessibility specialist has been carried out.
- No testing with assistive-technology users has been carried out.
- Automated checks cannot judge whether wording is clear, so plain-language review continues page by page.
- The header treatment of our mark renders its secondary line very small and is awaiting a replacement version.
If any part of this site is difficult to use, tell us through the contact page and describe what you were trying to do — we will fix it and reply. Related: Governance & Approvals.