Expertise
Capital should fit the project.
Credible project assumptions, a capital structure that matches them, a sponsor prepared to be underwritten, and a process that survives diligence. That sequence is the work.
Who this serves
- Sponsors and owners preparing to raise debt or equity for a specific project
- Landowners considering a joint venture rather than an outright sale
- Family offices and operators who need a capitalization plan reviewed before committing
- Borrowers whose lender has asked for materials they do not yet have
Problems addressed
- A budget and schedule that cannot be defended line by line
- Capital structure chosen before the project's real requirements were known
- Sponsor governance, reporting and decision rights left undefined
- Diligence materials scattered, inconsistent or missing entirely
- Funding gap discovered after commitments were already made
Scope
- Sources-and-uses review and funding-status reconciliation
- Scenario and sensitivity organization around the assumptions that actually move the outcome
- Capital-stack alternatives and the trade-offs each one imposes
- Sponsor governance, authority and decision-rights framework
- Lender and investor readiness materials review
- Diligence-room structure and ongoing reporting process
Work products
- Assumptions register with the source of each assumption named
- Missing-records list
- Sources and uses, with funding status by source
- Capital-stack alternatives memo
- Reporting and governance calendar
- Executive recommendation on the capital plan
How a mandate starts
- 01
A first conversation about the project, the decision in front of you and who holds control.
- 02
A fit review: whether this is a professional mandate, a principal or joint-venture discussion, or neither.
- 03
A paid diagnostic or a scoped mandate, with deliverables, timing and compensation written down before work begins.
- 04
Work proceeds against the agreed scope. Any change of scope is agreed separately, in writing.
Outside the default scope
- Securities placement, investor introductions or solicitation
- Negotiating a transaction on your behalf
- Any fee tied to a capital raise or a closed transaction
- Legal, tax, appraisal or accounting determinations
- A guaranteed raise, a committed lender or access to a predetermined investor list
Which route fits you
You are the sponsor or owner
You need a capital plan reviewed, strengthened or built. Start with a project discussion — this is a professional mandate, not an investment application.
You are bringing a project or a joint venture
You control land or a deal and want Threefold to look at it as a principal or partner. Submit it for a first look — no fee to be considered.
You are an investor or lender
You deploy debt or equity and want to understand how Threefold works. That is a relationship conversation, held privately.
You are unsure which applies
Describe the situation in plain terms and we will tell you which route fits, including when the answer is that none of them do.
Related reading
- Capital Readiness Brief — planned. What a lender or equity partner expects to see before a first meeting.
- Opportunity Submission Checklist — planned. The records that make a first look possible.
- Sources and uses, honestly reconciled — planned article on funding status versus funding assumption.
Questions we are asked
- Will you raise the money?
- No. Third-party capital work here is strategy, readiness, materials, governance and reporting. Raising, placing or soliciting capital for another sponsor is a separate regulated activity that is not offered on this site.
- Do you have a lender or investor list?
- Nothing of that kind is offered or implied. Any introduction of any sort would require a counsel-approved structure and appropriately authorized parties.
- How is a fee set?
- By scope, in a written agreement, before work starts. No compensation is tied to a capital raise or a closed transaction.
- Would Threefold invest in my project instead?
- Possibly, case by case, and through a separate route. Acquisition, co-development and landowner joint ventures are considered on their merits. No structure described here is a standing funded product, and submitting a project buys nothing and obligates no one.
- How does this differ from your own projects?
- On a Threefold principal project, capital strategy is our own decision-making. For another sponsor, it is professional work with a defined scope, and we hold no authority beyond what the engagement grants.
- What do you need from me to begin?
- Whatever exists today, and an honest account of what does not. Missing records are a normal starting condition, and 'unknown' is an acceptable answer.
Third-party capital work is capitalization strategy, readiness, materials, governance, process and reporting. Introductions, solicitation, placement and transaction-linked compensation require a counsel-approved structure and appropriately authorized parties, and are not offered here. A 'co-GP' or 'consultant' label does not change that. RAW Capital Raise is an architectural reference only and is neither a Threefold entity nor a subsidiary; none of its terms apply here. Nothing on this page is an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.
Held back pending legal review
The following claims are deliberately absent from this page until counsel approves the actual structure, authorized parties and compensation:
- — Any claim to arrange, place, source or secure debt or equity for a third party
- — Investor or lender introductions, referrals or access to a capital network
- — Success fees, placement fees, finder fees or any transaction-linked compensation
- — Co-sponsor, co-GP or sponsor-of-record titles used to describe third-party service work
- — Minimum investment, target return, capital available, check size or financing approval figures
- — Named third-party lenders, funds or investors, and any credential implying their endorsement
This page is written from the approved strategy plan and remains review-pending until the final approved practice copy is issued.