Skip to content

Article · Construction planning & cost controls

How owners should compare construction bids before choosing a contractor

The short answer

Never compare bid totals. Level the bids first: confirm each is priced against the same drawings and addenda, add back every exclusion, normalise allowances, compare general conditions and fee separately from work, test the schedule logic, and check contract terms, insurance, bonding and subcontractor coverage. The lowest number is frequently the least complete scope. A leveled comparison converts four unlike numbers into one decision about who has actually understood the project.

Reader decision
Which contractor do we award to, and on what basis can we defend that choice?
Author
Robert K. BishopCo-Founder & Managing Partner | Construction & Execution
Reviewed by
Gary SteudteManaging Partner | Development
Dates
Published September 18, 2026Updated September 18, 2026 · 9 min read

Owners regularly receive three or four proposals and put them in a column next to each other. That comparison is almost meaningless until the bids have been leveled, because each one prices a slightly different job.

Ten comparisons that matter

  1. 01Basis of bid: the exact drawing set, revision date and every addendum acknowledged. Different sets, different job.
  2. 02Exclusions and clarifications: read them twice and add each one back into the total with a real number.
  3. 03Allowances: normalise them. One bidder's low allowance is a future change order rather than a saving.
  4. 04Alternates and value-engineering items: separate them from base scope so the base comparison stays clean.
  5. 05General conditions and general requirements: compare the staffing, duration, and site cost line by line.
  6. 06Fee and overhead: state fee separately from work, and check how fee applies to changes and to allowance spend.
  7. 07Contingency: whose it is, what releases it, and what happens to what is unspent.
  8. 08Schedule: compare logic, milestones, long-lead procurement and inclement-weather assumptions, not just the end date.
  9. 09Subcontractor coverage: how many trades are actually bid, and which are still carried as an estimate.
  10. 10Terms: contract form, payment terms, retainage, insurance limits, bonding capacity and warranty.

Where hidden cost usually sits

  • Sitework, undercut and unsuitable-soil handling priced as an allowance.
  • Offsite utility work, tap and impact fees assumed to be the owner's cost.
  • Testing, special inspection and commissioning left out.
  • Permit fees and third-party review excluded.
  • Escalation on long-lead equipment with no stated basis or window.
  • Winter conditions, dewatering and temporary facilities.
  • Overtime or acceleration presumed to meet the owner's date.

Questions that reveal understanding

Ask each bidder for the three largest risks in the project, and how they priced them. Ask which trade they are least confident in and why. Ask what they would change about the drawings. A bidder who has genuinely studied the job answers specifically; one who has not answers in generalities.

Illustration only, not a Threefold engagement: two bids sit a little over five per cent apart. The lower one excludes special inspection and carries half the earthwork allowance. Leveled, it is the higher bid — and the one more likely to arrive as change orders after award.

Document the award

Write a short award recommendation recording the leveled numbers, the adjustments made, the schedule comparison, and why the selected bidder was chosen. This protects the decision with partners and lenders, and it gives the eventual change-order conversation a factual starting point.

One boundary: bid review and owner-side oversight are advisory. Contracting, licensed design, inspection, code interpretation and certification remain the responsibility of the licensed parties performing them, and contract terms should be reviewed by your counsel.

Checklist

Bid levelling worksheet

  • Confirm drawing set, revision date and addenda acknowledged by each bidder
  • List every exclusion and price it back in
  • Normalise all allowances to a common basis
  • Separate base scope from alternates and value-engineering items
  • Compare general conditions line by line, including duration and staffing
  • Show fee separately and confirm how it applies to changes
  • Identify whose contingency it is and what releases it
  • Compare schedule logic, milestones and long-lead procurement
  • Confirm trade coverage and which scopes are still estimated
  • Verify insurance limits, bonding capacity, retainage and warranty terms
  • Record a written award recommendation with the leveled numbers

Sources for technical material

  • AIA Document A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction

    American Institute of Architects

    Used for: Standard framing of contract terms, payment and change procedures compared during bid review.

  • ConsensusDocs 200, Standard Agreement and General Conditions Between Owner and Constructor

    ConsensusDocs

    Used for: An alternative standard contract form owners encounter when comparing terms.

Documents are named as their issuing bodies publish them. Naming a standard or statute does not imply any endorsement of Threefold, and published versions are amended from time to time — always work from the current release.

Questions

Should we always take the lowest leveled bid?

No. Leveling makes the numbers comparable; the decision still weighs capacity, staffing, trade relationships, current workload and past performance on similar work.

How many bidders is right?

Enough for a real comparison, few enough that each invests in a serious bid. Inviting too many usually lowers the quality of every bid you receive.

Can you review bids we have already received?

Yes, that is ordinary owner-side advisory work. It is a review of documents and pricing, not an inspection, certification or legal opinion.

General practice writing, not advice for a specific project. Examples are constructed illustrations and are not Threefold engagements or client outcomes. Nothing here is an offer of financing or securities, a commitment of funds, an appraisal, a legal or tax opinion, or a substitute for your counsel, licensed design professionals or the authority having jurisdiction.

Related services

Construction

Preconstruction, estimate and bid review, procurement and change control.

Advisory & Consulting

Owner representation, project controls and vendor review.

Related resources

Project Readiness Self-Check

Checks whether the controls around an award are in place.

Submit an Opportunity

If the project needs a broader look than a bid review.

Academy coursework covers estimating and cost control in its construction sequence. Academy participation does not create an advisory or construction engagement. Threefold Development Academy.

Ask for a bid review

Send the set and the proposals; we will tell you what the numbers actually compare.