Skip to content

Article · Entitlements, utilities & site readiness

Site readiness: what an assumptions register should actually contain

The short answer

An assumptions register is the list of every unproven statement your pro forma depends on, with the evidence, owner, verification date and cost consequence written next to each one. A useful register records the assumption, its current status, the document that would settle it, who is responsible, when it will be confirmed, and what it costs if it is wrong. If your register is a paragraph of caveats rather than a maintained table, the pro forma is a forecast of your hopes rather than a model of the site.

Reader decision
Is this pro forma defensible enough to commit money against, or still optimistic?
Author
Gary SteudteManaging Partner | Development
Reviewed by
Felipe SoaresCo-Founder & Managing Partner | Capital, Strategy & Partnerships
Dates
Published September 18, 2026Updated September 18, 2026 · 8 min read

Every early development model is built on assumptions. That is not a flaw; it is the nature of working before the facts exist. The failure is not making assumptions — it is losing track of which numbers are proven and which are still borrowed.

An assumptions register fixes that. It is a single maintained document that names each unproven input and states what would settle it.

The six fields that make a register useful

  1. 01The assumption, written as a specific claim rather than a topic — not "utilities", but "12-inch water main in the adjacent right of way has capacity for the planned unit count".
  2. 02Status: proven by document, partially supported, or unverified.
  3. 03The evidence that would settle it — the exact document, letter, report or approval.
  4. 04The responsible person, by name, inside your team or your consultant group.
  5. 05The date it will be confirmed, tied to the decision it blocks.
  6. 06The consequence if it is wrong, in cost, schedule or yield — and whether the contingency covers it.

What the register has to cover on a development site

  • Control: the instrument, its deadlines, extension rights and assignment rights.
  • Title: easements, access, setbacks, restrictions and anything that reduces buildable area.
  • Zoning and approvals: the current classification, the path being relied on, and the real calendar for hearings and plats.
  • Utilities: water, wastewater, power, gas and telecommunications capacity, the service provider, and who pays to extend.
  • Physical site: survey, topography, geotechnical findings, floodplain, drainage and detention.
  • Environmental: recognised environmental conditions, wetlands, tree and habitat constraints.
  • Yield: units or square feet actually achievable after setbacks, detention, parking and open space.
  • Cost: hard cost basis and its date, soft cost and fee schedule, impact and tap fees, offsite and infrastructure cost.
  • Schedule: approval duration, procurement lead times, construction duration and seasonal constraints.
  • Revenue: rent or price comparables, absorption, concessions and exit assumptions.
  • Capital: loan terms being assumed, equity requirement, interest reserve and carry duration.

How to tell a real register from a disclaimer

A real register changes. Entries move from unverified to proven, dates get met or get moved with a reason, and consequences get priced. If a register has not changed since it was created, nobody is working it — and the assumptions have simply become the plan.

A second test: pick the three assumptions with the largest cost consequence and ask who owns each of them and what document settles them. If those answers are not immediate, the register exists on paper only.

Illustration only, not a Threefold engagement: a site model assumes detention can be handled on a corner of the parcel. Once topography and drainage are confirmed, detention takes land the unit count depended on. The assumption was reasonable; not tracking it as an assumption is what made it expensive.

Where the register belongs in the decision

Before you go non-refundable, the register should be the agenda for the decision meeting. Every unverified line with a consequence larger than the contingency is a reason to extend, to reprice, or to walk — and saying so early is far cheaper than saying it later.

Checklist

Assumptions register self-audit

  • Each entry is a specific, testable claim rather than a topic heading
  • Each entry names the document that would settle it
  • Each entry names a responsible person, not a department
  • Each entry has a confirmation date tied to a real decision point
  • Each entry states the cost, schedule or yield consequence if wrong
  • Unverified entries with consequences above contingency are listed separately
  • The register has been updated since the last consultant report arrived
  • The register is the agenda for the go or no-go decision

Sources for technical material

  • Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 212 — municipal regulation of subdivisions and property development

    State of Texas

    Used for: Why plat and subdivision steps belong on the approval calendar as documented items.

  • Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 245 — issuance of local permits

    State of Texas

    Used for: Why the regulations in force at a project's start matter to an approval assumption.

  • Flood Map Service Center

    Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Used for: Confirming mapped floodplain rather than assuming it from a site visit.

Documents are named as their issuing bodies publish them. Naming a standard or statute does not imply any endorsement of Threefold, and published versions are amended from time to time — always work from the current release.

Questions

Is an assumptions register the same as a risk register?

They overlap but answer different questions. A risk register tracks events that might happen. An assumptions register tracks statements you are currently treating as true, and what would prove them.

How long should it be?

Long enough to hold every input with a material consequence, short enough to review in one sitting. On most sites that is a few dozen lines, not several hundred.

Who should maintain it?

One named person with authority to press consultants for answers. Shared ownership of a register reliably produces an unmaintained register.

General practice writing, not advice for a specific project. Examples are constructed illustrations and are not Threefold engagements or client outcomes. Nothing here is an offer of financing or securities, a commitment of funds, an appraisal, a legal or tax opinion, or a substitute for your counsel, licensed design professionals or the authority having jurisdiction.

Related services

Development

Feasibility, site readiness, entitlements, utilities and delivery.

Advisory & Consulting

Independent review of feasibility and the records behind it.

Related resources

Project Readiness Self-Check

A fast read on where the gaps sit before you commit.

The Cord of Three Framework™

How capital, development and construction have to agree on one plan.

Academy coursework covers feasibility and site readiness in its development sequence. Education and operating-company engagements remain separate. Threefold Development Academy.

Talk through a site

Bring us in before the irreversible decisions — the first conversation costs nothing.